Analysis: Should you pay for a premium SL membership?

I get this question a lot, and I can’t answer it definitively, because the answer is “it depends on what you want in SL.” Related to this are questions about buying land. Here are some factors that go into answering those questions for yourself. Caution: this involves a lot of math, and I am not a math guy, so you might want to check my assumptions and figuring. Continue reading “Analysis: Should you pay for a premium SL membership?”

Share this, please!
Share

Thoughtful, well-reasoned post about SL strengths and weaknesses

It can be hard to find an unbiased article about Second Life, between the extremes of promoters and naysayers. Here is a post that, though not unbiased, presents a solidly reasoned look at SL strengths and weaknesses. The writer, James Wagner Au, is very clear about his associations with SL, and though a proponent of SL, he does not view it through a rose-colored monitor. Take a look at “Second Life: Hype vs. Anti-Hype vs. Anti-Anti-Hype”.

Share this, please!
Share

SL user’s guide published

Colleague David Brown has acquired a copy of the newly-published Second Life: The Official Guide, and finds it to be useful, even though he’s a fairly advanced resident at this point. One of the authors of the book, James Wagner Au, is a reporter who has been living in SL and covering it daily almost since its inception. (The other three authors are certainly also SL experts; I just happen to know Au’s work.) This would be worth getting. (Linked through Amazon for your convenience.)

Share this, please!
Share

SL featured in the air

American Way, the in-flight magazine for American Airways, featured Second Life in its December issue. The article quotes Ed Castronova, an Indiana University professor who has authored a book highly recommended by our colleague David Brown. The book is called Synthetic Worlds. The article does a good job of examining the challenges as well as the opportunities within SL. It’s written from a business perspective, but gives a good flavor of SL for our purposes as well.

Share this, please!
Share

Two islands coming for SL in PSTCC

I’ll share more details later, but it’s pretty official at this point: PSTCC will have two islands in Second Life. We don’t know the delivery date yet, but if I understand it correctly the Islands will be named “Winding River Campus” or “Winding River College” or something like that. “Winding River” is reportedly the literal translation of “Pellissippi.”

Share this, please!
Share

Thoughts on bicameral brain, sliced differently

43 Folders is a really good blog however you look at it. Today, though, I’m impressed by the post on “Life hacks: Smarty Pants v. Dumbass.” It’s one of those insights that will make you say, “Of course!” and it explains so much of what we all deal with.

P.S. It’s worth looking at just for the graphic that illustrates the dichotomy.

Share this, please!
Share

Getting audio in SL

I’ve had a couple of good experiences being in Second Life and getting audio via a Skypecast feed—enough to recommend that faculty members get a free Skype account.

If you’re not familiar with Skype, it is primarily a way to make free “phone” calls to any other Skype member PC to PC, and low-cost calls to regular telephones from your computer. You need to have some basic equipment, of course, including most usually headphones and a microphone. Most computer headphones that you can pick up at Wal-Mart will satisfy this, so it’s a low-cost solution for its original intention, i.e., talking one-on-one to someone else.

It has also turned out to be a low-cost (in most cases, free) way of audio conferencing. That’s what we’re interested in here.

I must tell you I have mixed feelings about it. Chat certainly has disadvantages, not the least being that for most people it takes longer (even fast typists can’t type as fast as the average person can talk) and loses the subtle intonations that can come from voice. However, I don’t particularly like an audio-only channel. I’ve always felt more awkward on the telephone than I do either in person or via written media. Plus, the audio leaves no record.

I’ll admit to having gotten accustomed to e-mail, bulletin boards, chat, etc., automatically enabling record-keeping. I’m an old reporter, but with electronic communication I seldom have to take notes any more–I can just go back through the actual transcript. I’ve gotten so rusty that when I recently had to cover a couple of audio-based gatherings, I was only saved by the fact that someone had recorded it and posted the results for download.

Having said that, I think Skype could make our inworld training sessions better. It will be simpler than trying Audrey’s patience by setting up an Elluminate session each time. On the other hand Elluminate would allow us to record the session. We should probably try it both ways.

If you want to try Skype, just go to their Web site and download the software. When you install it, you get the opportunity to create a free account. The software will run in the background in your systray (the little area in the lower right-hand corner of your screen–officially the “Notification Area,” I think). For our purposes, what will happen is that I will create a Skypecast and send you the link for it. (I can also post it via Chat inworld, where you can copy and paste it into a browser.) If you just follow that link you’ll be able to log into your Skype account and join the audio.

Hint: this limits your ability to eat while you work.

The Skype client itself is very small and shouldn’t interfere with running SL, but having to open your browser could be another challenge. Some computers don’t have enough memory to have SL and a browser open at the same time. That will be one of the things for us to consider. Of course, if that’s the case you probably won’t be able to run SL and Elluminate at the same time.
I will Skypecast the training session scheduled for this Friday, so if you want to try this, go ahead and get a Skype account and software between now and Friday.

Share this, please!
Share

First Parkway campus CC a success

We had 22 people take part in the Conversation Café, not counting the two facilitators (plus a couple of people who came through just long enough to get their passports stamped, but they don’t count). Mary Bledsoe, in charge of the Student Life office, provided cookies and coffee from the cafeteria, which everyone seemed to enjoy. Discussion was lively, and in some cases stayed with the announced topic (Overwork, Overscheduling), and sometimes went in other directions (such as the recent election), all of which was fine, since the point of CCs is more to connect than to stay on topic.

I’m always amazed at Marsha Hupfel’s ability to summarize the tables at the CCs she facilitates. Maybe she’s just better organized, and maybe she thinks to get a reporter at each table. We’ll aim for that next time.

I was impressed, though, that at least one table connected with each other enough to make arrangements to get together again to continue discussion.

We have decided to schedule two CCs on the Parkway campus in the spring, one in February and one in March. One will target the MWF pattern of classes, and the other will target the TR pattern of classes. Although we wanted to establish a time to begin a tradition, we’ve already seen that we need to shift the MWF time a bit to more closely align with classes, so whatever day we schedule, we’ll start the CC at 2 p.m., and we’ll set the TR time to coincide with that class pattern as well.

Be sure to check the listings page for those and other Conversation Cafés at PSTCC.

Share this, please!
Share